Avi Baratz: Trusted Fraud Defense Lawyer in Toronto

The Criminal Code of Canada surprisingly does not define Fraud. Instead, it is defined through legal precedence which holds ultimately that “to defraud is to deprive by deceit, to deceive by falsehood to induce a state of mind or to defraud by deceit to induce a course of action”. The Criminal Courts’ have been loath to attempt anything in the nature of an exhaustive definition of “defraud” but one may safely say, that two elements are essential: dishonesty and deprivation. To be found guilty of Fraud, the intentional aspect is needed to be proved by the Crown beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused must have subjective knowledge of the prohibited act and also, subjective knowledge that the prohibited act could have as a consequence: the deprivation of another. Where the conduct and knowledge required by these definitions are established, the accused will be found guilty whether he actually intended the prohibited consequences or was reckless as to whether it would occur. There are numerous types of dishonest activities that can lead to fraud charges such as welfare fraud, corporate fraud, dishonest conduct in business that would cause a deprivation, securities fraud, banking fraud, real estate transaction fraud, mortgage fraud, and investor fraud to name a few.